Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

Adv Clin Exp Med
Impact Factor (IF) – 1.514
Index Copernicus (ICV 2018) – 157.72
MNiSW – 40
Average rejection rate – 84.38%
ISSN 1899–5276 (print)
ISSN 2451-2680 (online)
Periodicity – monthly

Download PDF

Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

2019, vol. 28, nr 8, August, p. 1021–1026

doi: 10.17219/acem/98960

Publication type: original article

Language: English

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 3.0 Open Access

The radiological evaluation of the nasal cavity, conchae and nasal septum volumes by stereological method: A retrospective cone-beam computed tomography study

Begumhan Turhan1,A,B,C,D,E, Piraye Kervancioglu2,A,C,D,E, Eda Didem Yalcin3,A,B,C,D

1 Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hasan Kalyoncu University, Gaziantep, Turkey

2 Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Turkey

3 Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Gaziantep University, Turkey


Background. The nasal cavity (NC) is the entrance to the respiratory system. Many studies have been conducted on the structure, function and volume of the NC. Only a few studies were performed assessing the volumetric values of NC and conchae.
Objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate the volumetric measurements of the NC, conchae and nasal septum using the stereological method.
Material and Methods. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 200 individuals (100 females and 100 males) aged 8–59 years were retrospectively evaluated. Inferior nasal concha and middle nasal concha, NC and nasal septum volumes were measured on these images. Measurements were made using point counting method, which is based on the Cavalieri principle. The mean values of the measured structures for 2 age groups and for each gender were obtained. Differences between the groups and genders of all parameters were examined. The volume fractions of measured volumes were calculated.
Results. The mean volumes of the nasal septum, left and right NC, left and right inferior nasal conchae, and left and right middle nasal conchae were 4.99 ±1.51 cm³, 7.44 ±2.93 cm³, 7.68 ±2.99 cm³, 3.10 ±1.11 cm³, 3.04 ±1.02 cm³, 1.32 ±0.56 cm³, and 1.28 ±0.49 cm³, respectively. Gender and age differences were statistically significant in all volumes (p < 0.05).
Conclusion. The data obtained in this study may assist clinicians in planning treatment, assessing the treatment results of pathological conditions within the NC, and help surgeons in preoperational and postoperational evaluations, especially in dentistry, otorhinolaryngology and plastic surgery.

Key words

Cavalieri principle, stereology, nasal cavity volume, cone-beam computed tomography

References (32)

  1. Acer N, Bayar B, Başaloglu H, Oner E, Bayar K, Sankur S. Unbiased estimation of the calcaneus volume using the Cavalieri principle on computed tomography images. Ann Anat. 2008;190(5):452–460.
  2. Acer N, Ertekin T, Küçük A, Babaoglu C, Cankaya MN, Camurdanoglu M. 20–25 Yaş Arası Sağlıklı Gençlerde Gri ve Beyaz Cevher Hacimlerinin İncelenmesi: Planimetrik Çalışma. Kocatepe Tıp Derg. 2008;9(2):45–51.
  3. Caprioglio A, Meneghel M, Fastuca R, Zecca PA, Nucera R, Nosetti L. Rapid maxillary expansion in growing patients: Correspondence between 3-dimensional airway changes and polysomnography. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78(1):23–27.
  4. Cordasco G, Nucera R, Fastuca R, et al. Effects of orthopedic maxillary expansion on nasal cavity size in growing subjects: A low dose computer tomography clinical trial. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;76(11):1547–1551.
  5. El-Shazly AE, Poirrier AL, Cabay J, Lefebvre PP. Anatomic variations of lateral nasal wall. Clin Anat. 2012;25(3):340–346.
  6. Emirzeoglu M, Sahin B, Celebi M, Uzun A, Bilgic S, Tontus HO. Estimation of nasal cavity and conchae volumes by stereological method. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2012;71(2):105–108.
  7. Ertekin T, Değermenci M, Nisari M, Unur E, Coşkun A. Age-related changes of nasal cavity and conchae volumes and volume fractions in children: A stereological study. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2016;75(1):38–47.
  8. Ghoneima A, Imburgia A, Halum S, Vandis M, Kula K. Three-dimensional airway analysis of trumpet players vs non-trumpet players. Oral Radiol. 2015;31(2):105–113.
  9. Guijarro-Martinez R, Swennen GR. Cone-beam computerized tomography imaging and analysis of the upper airway: A systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40(11):1227–1237.
  10. Gundersen HJG. Notes on the estimation of the numerical density of arbitrary profiles: The edge effect. J Microsc. 1977;111(2):219–223.
  11. Gundersen HJ, Jensen EB. The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology and its prediction. J Microsc. 1987;147(Pt 3):229–263.
  12. Hodez C, Griffaton-Taillandier C, Bensimon I. Cone-beam imaging: Applications in ENT. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2011;128(2):65–78.
  13. Kayipmaz S, Sezgin OS, Saricaoglu ST, Bas O, Sahin B, Küçük M. The estimation of the volume of sheep mandibular defects using cone-beam computed tomography images and a stereological method. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40(3):165–169.
  14. Kula K, Jeong AE, Stacey H, Kendall D, Ghoneima A. Three dimensional evaluation of upper airway volume in children with different dental and skeletal malocclusions. J Biomed Graph Comput. 2013;3(4):116.
  15. Mouton PR. Principles and Practices of Unbiased Stereology. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press; 2003:5–6.
  16. Odaci E, Sahin B, Sonmez OF, Kaplan S, Bas O, Bilgic S. Rapid estimation of the vertebral body volume: A combination of the Cavalieri principle and computed tomography images. Eur J Radiol. 2003;48(3):316–326.
  17. Onuk B, Kabak M, Sahin B, Ince NG, Selcuk MB. New method for estimating the volume and volume fractions of the nasal structures in the goose (Anser anser domesticus) using computed tomography images. Br Poult Sci. 2013;54(4):441–446.
  18. Ophir DE, Shapira AA, Marshak GS. Total inferior turbinectomy for nasal airway obstruction. Arch Otolaryngol. 1995;111(2):93–95.
  19. Orhan İ, Soylu E, Altın G, Yılmaz F, Çalım ÖF, Örmeci T. Paranazal sinüs anatomik varyasyonlarının bilgisayarlı tomografi ile analizi. Abant Medical Journal. 2014;3(2):145–149.
  20. Patel RM, Pinto JM. Olfaction: Anatomy, physiology and disease. Clin Anat. 2014;27(1):54–60.
  21. Santos RDP, Habermann W, Hofmann T, Stammberger H. Pre and post functional endoscopic sinus surgery nasal cavity volume assessment by acoustic rhinometry. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;72(4):549–553.
  22. Samoliński BK, Grzanka A, Gotlib T. Changes in nasal cavity dimensions in children and adults by gender and age. Laryngoscope. 2007;117(8):1429–1433.
  23. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006;72(1):75–80.
  24. Sharma S. Importance of treating compensatory hypertrophy of inferior turbinate in cases of septal deviation causing nasal obstruction. Journal of Otolaryngology ENT-Research. 2016;4(3):00097.
  25. Smith T, Ghoneima A, Stewart K, et al. Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of airway volume changes after rapid maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;141(5):618–626.
  26. Souza RP, Junior JPB, Tornin OS, et al. Sinonasal complex: Radiological anatomy. Radiologia. 2006;39(5):367–372.
  27. Standring S, ed. Gray’s Anatomy the Basis of Clinical Practice. 39th ed. Barcelona, Spain: Elsevier Ltd.; 2005:547–561.
  28. Starbuck JM, Friel MT, Ghoneima A, Flores RL, Tholpady S, Kula K. Nasal airway and septal variation in unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate. Clin Anat. 2014;27(7):999–1008.
  29. Terheyden H, Maune S, Mertens J, Hilberg O. Acoustic rhinometry: Validation by three-dimensionally reconstructed computer tomographic scans. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000;89(3):1013–1021.
  30. Tso HH, Lee JS, Huang JC. Evaluation of the human airway using cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108(5):768–776.
  31. White SC, Pharoah MJ. The evolution and application of dental maxillofacial imaging modalities. Dent Clin North Am. 2008;52(4):689–705.
  32. Zeng J, Gao X. A prospective CBCT study of upper airway changes after rapid maxillary expansion. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;77(11):1805–1810.