Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

Adv Clin Exp Med
Impact Factor (IF) – 1.227
Index Copernicus (ICV 2018) – 157.72
MNiSW – 40
Average rejection rate – 84.38%
ISSN 1899–5276 (print)
ISSN 2451-2680 (online)
Periodicity – monthly

Download PDF

Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

2019, vol. 28, nr 6, June, p. 825–832

doi: 10.17219/acem/102617

Publication type: original article

Language: English

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 3.0 Open Access

Arabic language skin-related stigmatization instruments: Translation and validation process

Dimitre Dimitrov1,A,B,D,F, Łukasz Matusiak2,C,E,F, Andrea Evers3,E,F, Mohammad Jafferany4,E,F, Jacek Szepietowski2,A,C,E,F

1 Presidential Medical Wing, Al Mafraq and Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, UAE

2 Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland

3 Department of Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Leiden University, the Netherlands

4 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Central Michigan University, Saginaw, USA

Abstract

Background. Skin diseases are frequently the reason for social rejection. Therefore, the assessment of stigmatization level in patients suffering from dermatoses plays a crucial role in providing proper health service.
Objectives. The aim of this study was to create and validate Arabic language versions of stigmatization instruments – the 6-item Stigmatization Scale and the Feelings of Stigmatization Questionnaire.
Material and Methods. Development of the Arabic language versions was done with international standards of forward-back translations. The validation was performed on 39 psoriatic individuals. The group included 11 females and 28 males. The subjects were asked to fill out both questionnaires: the 6-item Stigmatization Scale and the Feelings of Stigmatization Questionnaire (Arabic language versions) at the time of examination and 7 days after enrollment for reassessment to evaluate test-retest reliability. During the first visit the patients additionally filled out an already existing Arabic version of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), which was used as a reference questionnaire.
Results. The results concerning the integrity of instruments were very good, and the Cronbach's α coefficient for both scales was 0.89. The reproducibility level assessed with interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) stood at 0.91 for the 6-item Stigmatization Scale and 0.92 for the Feelings of Stigmatization Questionnaire. There was a strong correlation between total score of the 6-item Stigmatization Scale and DLQI. Significant negative moderate correlation was documented between the Feelings of Stigmatization Questionnaire and DLQI. Moreover, both stigmatization instruments correlated significantly with each other.
Conclusion. The developed Arabic language versions of the abovementioned stigmatization instruments can be successfully used in daily clinical practice as well as in clinical research.

Key words

quality of life, stigmatization, skin, 6-item Stigmatization Scale, Feelings of Stigmatization Questionnaire

References (17)

  1. Miller-Keane BF. Encyclopedia and Dictionary of Medicine, Nursing, and Allied Health. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2003:1676.
  2. Ibekwe PU, Ogunbiyi AO, Ogun OG, George AO. Social stigmatization of two sisters with lamellar ichthyosis in Ibadan, Nigeria. Int J Dermatol. 2012;51(1):67–68.
  3. Masnari O, Landolt MA, Roessler J, et al. Self- and parent-perceived stigmatisation in children and adolescents with congenital or acquired facial differences. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(12):1664–1670.
  4. Kassi M, Kassi M, Afghan AK, Rehman R, Kasi PM. Marring leishmaniasis: The stigmatization and the impact of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Pakistan and Afghanistan. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2(10):e259.
  5. Lawrence JW, Rosenberg L, Rimmer RB, Thombs BD, Fauerbach JA. Perceived stigmatization and social comfort: Validating the constructs and their measurement among pediatric burn survivors. Rehabil Psychol. 2010;55(4):360–371.
  6. Dimitrov D, Szepietowski JC. Instruments to assess stigmatization in dermatology. Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online). 2017;71:901–905.
  7. Dimitrov D, Szepietowski JC. Stigmatization in dermatology with a special focus on psoriatic patients. Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online). 2017;71:1115–1122.
  8. Lu Y, Duller P, van der Valk PGM, Evers AWM. Helplessness as predictor of perceived stigmatization in patients with psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. Dermatol Psychosom. 2003;4:146–150.
  9. Ginsburg IH, Link BG. Feelings of stigmatization in patients with psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989;20(1):53–63.
  10. Finlay AY, Khan GK. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI): A simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1994;19(3):210–216.
  11. Zaki R, Bulgiba A, Nordin N, Ismail NA. Systematic review of statistical methods used to test for reliability of medical instruments measuring continuous variables. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2013;16(6):803–807.
  12. Frishkopf M. Music and Media in the Arab World. Cairo, Egypt: The American University of Cairo Press; 2010.
  13. El-Shamy HM. Folk Traditions of Arab World: A Guide of Motif Classification. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press; 1995.
  14. Dardas LA, Simmons LA. The stigma of mental illness in Arab families: A concept analysis. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015;22(9):668–679.
  15. Zolezzi M, Alamri M, Shaar S, Rainkie D. Stigma associated with mental illness and its treatment in the Arab culture: A systematic review. Int J Soc Psych. 2018;64(6):597–609. doi:10.1177/0020764018789200
  16. Hrehorów E, Szepietowski J, Reich A, Evers AW, Ginsburg IH. Instruments for stigmatization evaluation in patients suffering from psoriasis: Polish language versions. Dermatol Klin. 2006;8:253–258.
  17. Marciniak J, Reich A, Szepietowski J. The Family Dermatology Life Quality Index – formulation and validation of the Polish version. Forum Dermatologicum. 2016;2:24–28.