Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

Adv Clin Exp Med
Impact Factor (IF) – 1.227
Index Copernicus (ICV 2018) – 157.72
MNiSW – 40
Average rejection rate – 84.38%
ISSN 1899–5276 (print)
ISSN 2451-2680 (online)
Periodicity – monthly

Download PDF

Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

2019, vol. 28, nr 4, April, p. 541–546

doi: 10.17219/acem/78775

Publication type: original article

Language: English

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 3.0 Open Access

Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: Experiences in limiting futile therapy from three Polish intensive care departments

Jacek Siewiera1,A,B,C,D,E,F, Dariusz Tomaszewski2,C,D,E,F, Jacek Piechocki2,B,E,F, Andrzej Kübler3,A,E,F

1 Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Military Institute of Medicine, Warszawa, Poland

2 Medical Hyperbaric Center, Warszawa, Poland

3 1st Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland

Abstract

Background. In intensive care units (ICUs), a patient’s vital functions may be maintained, regardless of the patient’s chances of survival. A key issue is how to precisely determine the moment in which life-support treatment should be withheld. In many countries, the decision-making process is regulated by the guidelines of scientific societies. However, heuristic errors may influence this process.
Objectives. The objective of this study was to assess factors involved in decisions to implement or withhold treatment in general ICUs in Poland.
Material and Methods. The medical records of patients treated in 3 clinical ICUs of general, cardiosurgical and neurosurgical profile were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with a diagnosis of brain death were finally excluded from the study.
Results. The records of 1,449 patients hospitalized between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014 were analyzed. Of these, 226 patient cases were evaluated. There were no correlations between the placement of restrictions on resuscitation in specific cases, use of noradrenaline, frequency of blood gas testing, and patients’ age. There was a relationship between these factors and the duration of hospitalization in the ICU. There was a direct relation between a “do not resuscitate” (DNR) order in a patient’s record and the frequency of both resuscitation procedures and withholding catecholamine treatment in the hours preceding a patient’s death.
Conclusion. Treatment was withheld in about 20% of cases involving dying patients in analyzed ICUs, regardless of age. Placing a limit on treatment consisted of either withholding new procedures or withdrawing existing therapy. The length of stay in the ICU affected the decisions to limit treatment.

Key words

critical care, withholding life-sustaining treatment, withdrawing life-sustaining treatment

References (33)

  1. Ferrand E, Robert R, Ingrand P, Lemaire F; French LATAREA Group. Withholding and withdrawal of life support in intensive-care units in France: A prospective survey. Lancet. 2001;357(9249):9–14.
  2. Esteban A, Gordo F, Solsona JF, et al. Withdrawing and withholding life support in the intensive care unit: A Spanish prospective multi-centre observational study. Intensive Care Med. 2001;27(11):1744–1749.
  3. Prendergast TJ, Claessens MT, Luce JM. A national survey of end-of-life care for critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158(4):1163–1167.
  4. Smedira NG, Evans BH, Grais LS, et al. Withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. N Engl J Med. 1990;322(5):309–315.
  5. Sjökvist P, Sundin PO, Berggren L. Limiting life support. Experiences with a special protocol. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998;42:232–237.
  6. Hoel H, Skjaker SA, Haagensen R, Stavem K. Decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment in a Norwegian intensive care unit. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014;58(3):329–336.
  7. Jensen HI, Ammentorp J, Ørding H. Withholding or withdrawing therapy in Danish regional ICUs: Frequency, patient characteristics and decision process. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011;55(3):344–351.
  8. Wunsch H, Harrison DA, Harvey S, Rowan K. End-of-life decisions: A cohort study of the withdrawal of all active treatment in intensive care units in the United Kingdom. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31(6):823–831.
  9. Cook DJ. Transdisciplinary research to understand the role of bias and heuristics. In: Curtis JR, Rubenfield GD, eds. Managing Death in the ICU. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press Inc.; 2001:59–67.
  10. Petillä V, Ala-Kokko T, Varpula T, Laurila J, Hovilehto S. On what are our end-of-life decisions based? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002:46:947–954.
  11. Koch KA, Rodeffer HD, Wears RL. Changing patterns of terminal care management in an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1994;22(2):233–243.
  12. Brieva JL, Cooray P, Rowley M. Withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies in intensive care: An Australian experience. Crit Care Resusc. 2009;11(4):266–268.
  13. Kübler A, Adamik B, Lipińska-Gediga M, Kędziora J, Stróżecki Ł. End-of-life attitudes of intensive care physicians in Poland: Results of a national survey. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(8):1290–1296.
  14. Vincent JL. Forgoing life support in western European intensive care units: The results of an ethical questionnaire. Critical Care Med. 1999;27(8):1626–1633.
  15. Nolin T, Andersson R. Withdrawal of medical treatment in the ICU. A cohort study of 318 cases during 1994–2000. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003;47(5):501–507.
  16. Kübler A, Siewiera J, Durek G, Kusza K, Piechota J, Szkulmowski Z. Guidelines regarding the ineffective maintenance of organ functions (futile therapy) in ICU patients incapable of giving informed statement of will. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2014;46(4):215–220.
  17. Holzapfel L, Demingeon G, Piralla B, Biot L, Nallet B. A four-step protocol for limitation of treatment in terminal care. An observational study in 475 intensive care unit patients. Intensive Care Med. 2002; 28(9):1309–1315.
  18. Prendergast TJ, Luce JM. Increasing incidence of withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;155(1):15–20.
  19. Boumendil A, Somme D, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Guidet B. Should elderly patients be admitted to the intensive care unit? Intensive Care Med. 2007;33(7):1252–1262.
  20. Farfel JM, Franca SA, Sitta Mdo MC, Filho WJ, Carvalho CR. Age, invasive ventilatory support and outcomes in elderly patients admitted to intensive care units. Age Ageing. 2009;38(5):515–520.
  21. Nguyen YL, Angus DC, Boumendil A, Guidet B. The challenge of admitting the very elderly to intensive care. Ann Intensive Care. 2011; 1(1):29.
  22. Castillo-Lorente E, Rivera-Fernández R, Vázquez-Mata G. Limitation of therapeutic activity in elderly critically ill patients. Critical Care Med. 1997;25(10):1643–1648.
  23. Hanson LC, Danis M. Use of life-sustaining care for the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(8):772–777.
  24. Hamel MB, Phillips RS, Teno JM, et al. Seriously ill hospitalized adults: Do we spend less on older patients? Support Investigators. Study to understand prognoses and preference for outcomes and risk of treatments. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996;44(9):1043–1048.
  25. Boumendil A, Maury E, Reinhard I, Luquel L, Offenstadt G, Guidet B. Prognosis of patients aged 80 years and over admitted in medical intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(4):647–654.
  26. Nicolas F, Le Gall JR, Loirat P, Alperovitch A, Loirat P, Villers D. Influence of patients’ age on survival, level of therapy and length of stay in intensive care units. Intensive Care Med. 1987;13(1):9–13.
  27. Chelluri L, Grenvik A, Silverman M. Intensive care for critically ill elderly: Mortality, costs, and quality of life. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(10): 1013–1022.
  28. Mahul P, Perrot D, Tempelhoff G, et al. Short and long term prognosis, functional outcome following ICU for elderly. Intensive Care Med. 1991;17(1):7–10.
  29. Garrouste-Orgeas M, Timsit JF, Montuclard L, et al. Decision-making process, outcome, and 1-year quality of life of octogenarians referred for intensive care unit admission. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32(7):1045–1051.
  30. Garrouste-Orgeas M, Boumendil A, Pateron D, et al; ICE-CUB Group. Selection of intensive care unit admission criteria for patients aged 80 years and over and compliance of emergency and intensive care unit physicians with the selected criteria: An observational, multicenter, prospective study. Critical Care Med. 2009;37(11):2919–2928.
  31. Callahan D. Old age and new policy. JAMA. 1989;261(6):905–906.
  32. Callahan D. Controlling the costs of health care for the elderly: Fair means and foul. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(10):744–746.
  33. Boumendil A, Aegerter P, Guidet B; CUB-Rea Network. Treatment intensity and outcome of patients aged 80 and older in intensive care units: A multicenter matched-cohort study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(1):88–93.