Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

Adv Clin Exp Med
Impact Factor (IF) – 1.227
Index Copernicus (ICV 2018) – 157.72
MNiSW – 40
Average rejection rate – 84.38%
ISSN 1899–5276 (print)
ISSN 2451-2680 (online)
Periodicity – monthly

Download PDF

Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

2015, vol. 24, nr 2, March-April, p. 341–348

doi: 10.17219/acem/40450

Publication type: original article

Language: English

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 3.0 Open Access

Comparison of Autologous and Heterologous Bone Graft Stability Effects for Filling Maxillary Bone Gap After Le Fort I Osteotomy

Cengiz Eser1,A,B,C,D, Eyüphan Gencel1,C, Mahmut Gökdoğan1,B, Erol Kesiktaş1,E, Metin Yavuz1,F

1 Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Cukurova University, Turkey

Abstract

Background. The amount of postoperative maxillary relapse of two different bone graft materials after Le Fort I osteotomy were compared in this study.
Objectives. The aim of this study is to compare postoperative maxillary relapse rates using heterologous and autologous graft materials after Le Fort I osteotomy.
Material and Methods. A total of 80 patients who had developmental malocclusion were analyzed retrospectively in this study. Twenty nine (36.2%) and 51 (63.8%) patients underwent Le Fort I osteotomy, and Le Fort I and bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (two-jaw surgery), respectively. Forty two (52.5%) maxillary bone gaps were filled with heterologous bone grafts (group A) and 38 (47.5%) were filled with autologous bone grafts (group B) after Le Fort I osteotomy. The cephalometric graphics and measurements were taken before (T1), 1 week after (T2), and 1 year after (T3) the surgery. The results were documented and determined by the Dolphin imaging 10.5 (Dolphin Imaging, Chatsworth, Calif.) computer program for skeletal relapse. Whether or not the relationship between group A’s and B’s maxillary relapse rates was evaluated in the postoperative period.
Results. It was observed that both graft materials have positive effects on maxillary relapse rate in the postoperative period. When the groups are compared to each other, the relapse rates were similar between group A (8.3%) and group B (10.8%) (p > 0.05).
Conclusion. Heterologous bone graft material (Osteoplant®-Flex) is thought to be a good alternative to autologous grafts in decreasing the relapse rates and reducing the morbidity of the donor area of the patients who underwent Le Fort I osteotomy.

Key words

bone graft, Le Fort, malocclusion.

References (30)

  1. Schendel SA: Orthognathic surgery. In: Achauer BM, Eriksson E, Guyuron B, Coleman JJ, Russell RC, Vander Kolk CA, Eds. Plastic Surgery 2000, 2, St. Louis: Mosby, 871–895.
  2. Borstlap WA, Stoelinga PJW, Hoppenreijs TJM: Stabilisation of sagittal split advancement osteotomies with miniplates: a prospective, multicentre study with two-year follow-up Part I. Clinical parameters. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004, 33, 433–441.
  3. Louis PJ, Waite PD, Austin RB: Long-term skeletal stability after rigid fixation of Le Fort I osteotomies with advancement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993, 22, 82–86.
  4. Bothur S, Blomqvist JE, Isakson S: Stability of Le Fort I osteotomy with advancement: a comparison of single maxillary surgery and a two-jaw procedure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998, 56, 1029–1033.
  5. Nolan PC, Nicholas RM, Mulholland BJ, Mollan RAB, Wilson DJ: Culture of Human Osteoblasts on Demineralized Human Bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992, 74, 284–286.
  6. Traini T, Valentini P, Iezzi G, Piattelli A: A histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of anorganic bovine bone retrieved 9 years after a sinus augmentation procedure. J Periodontol 2007, 78, 955–961.
  7. El-Sabban ME, El-Khoury H, Hamdan-Khalil R, Sindet-Pedersen S, Bazarbachi A: Xenogenic bone matrix extracts induce osteoblastic differentiation of human bone marrow – derived mesenchymal stem cells. Regen Med 2007, 2, 383– 390.
  8. Di Stefano DA, Artese L, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, Pagnutti S, Piccirilli M, Perrotti V: Alveolar ridge regeneration with equine spongy bone: a clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical case series. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009, 11, 90–100.
  9. Rosen HM: Aesthetic orthognathic surgery. In: Mathes JM Ed. Plastic Surgery 2006, Vol. 2, China: Saunders, 649–686.
  10. Hausamen JE: The scientific development of maxillofacial surgery in the 20th century and an outlook into the future. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001, 29, 2–21.
  11. Waite PD, Tejera TJ, Anucul B: The stability of maxillary advancement using Le Fort I osteotomy with and without genial bone grafting. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996, 25, 264–267.
  12. Sàndor GKB, Lindholm TC, Clokie CML: Bone Regeneration of the Cranio-maxillofacial and Dento-alveolar Skeletons in the Framework of Tissue Engineering. In: Eds. N. Ashammakhi & P. Ferretti. Topics in Tissue Engineering 2003, Volume 1, II Bone, Chapter 7. e-Book, 1–45.
  13. Costa F, Robiony M, Politi M: Stability of Le Fort I osteotomy in maxillary advancement: Review of the literature. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1999, 14, 207–213.
  14. Rosen HM: Porous, block hydroxyapetite as an interpositional bone graft substitute in orthognathic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989, 83, 985–993.
  15. Rosen HM, Ackerman JL: Porous block hydroxyapatite in orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod 1991, 61, 185–191.
  16. Kramer FJ, Baethge C, Swennen G, Teltzrow T, Schulze A, Berten J, Brachvogel P: Intraand perioperative complications of the Le Fort I osteotomy: A prospective evaluation of 1000 patients. J Craniofac Surg 2004, 15, 971–977.
  17. Egbert M, Hepworth B, Mydall R, West R: Stability of Le Fort I osteotomy with maxillary advancement: A comparison of combined wire fixation an rigid fixation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995, 53, 243–247.
  18. Waite PD, Tejera TJ, Anucul B: The stability of maxillary advancement using Le Fort I osteotomy with and without genial bone grafting. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996, 25, 264–267.
  19. Hoffman GR, Brennan PA: The skeletal stability of one-piece Le Fort I osteotomy to advance the maxilla. Part 2. The influence of uncontrollable clinical variables. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004, 42, 226–230.
  20. Arpornmaeklong P, Heggie AA, Shand JM: A comparision of the stability of single-piece and segmental Le Fort I maxillary advancements. J Cranifac Surg 2003, 14, 3–9.
  21. Landes C, Ballon A: Skeletal stability in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: P (L/DL) LA-resorbable versus titanium osteofixation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006, 118, 724–735.
  22. Mehra P, Castro V, Freitas RZ: Stability of the Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary advancement using rigid fixation and porous block hydroxyapatite grafting. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002, 94, 18–23.
  23. Wyatt WM: Sagittal ramus split osteotomy: Literature review and suggested modification of technique. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997, 35, 137–141.
  24. Hoffman GR, Moloney FB, Effeney DJ: The stability of facial advancement surgery (in the management of combined mid and lower dento-facial deficiency). J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1994, 22, 86–94.
  25. Baker DL, Stoelinga PJ, Blijdorp PA, Brouns JJ, Baker DL: Long-term stability after inferior maxillary repositioning by miniplate fixation. Aesthetic Reconstr Surg 1992, 21, 320–326.
  26. Braun TW, Sotereanos GC: Autogenous regional bone grafting as an adjunct in orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984, 42, 43–48.
  27. Gurstein KW, Sather AH, An KN, Larson BE: Stability after inferior or anterior maxillary repositioning by Le Fort I osteotomy: a biplanar stereocephalometric study. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1998, 13,131–143.
  28. Van Sickels JE, Richardson DA: Stability of orthognathic surgery: a review of rigid fixation. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996, 34, 279–285.
  29. Costa F, Robiony M, Politi M: Stability of Le Fort I osteotomy in maxillary inferior repositioning: Review of the literature. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 2000, 15, 197–204.
  30. Ballon A, Laudemann K, Sader R, Landes CA: Segmental stability of resorbable P(L/DL)LA-TMC osteosynthesis versus titanium miniplates in orthognatic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012, 40, 408–414.